Results

Show: Training | Testing | Custom

Overall

MethodChallengeAvg. Ov.Avg. Acc.Avg.Computation timeUser-interaction
 123rankrankrank(per dataset)(per vessel)
MHT
Friman et al.
     X 2.52 1.77 2.15 6 minutes 2 to 5 points (2.6 avg)
VirtualContrast2b
Wang and Smedby
     X 4.01 3.81 3.91 2 minutes 3 points
Tracer
Szymczak
     X 5.23 2.97 4.10 30 minutes Point S and point E
BayesianMaxPaths
Lesage et al.
     X 2.88 5.96 4.42 4 minutes Point S and point E
DepthFirstModelFit
Zambal et al.
 X     7.55 4.01 5.78 4-8 minutes  
KnowledgeBasedMinPath
Krissian et al.
   X   5.21 10.26 7.74 7 hours Point E
AutoCoronaryTree
Tek et al.
 X     9.40 6.66 8.03 < 30 seconds  
CocomoBeach
Kitslaar et al.
 X     10.27 6.22 8.25 70 seconds  
GVFTube'n'Linkage
Bauer and Bischof
 X     6.69 9.92 8.31 10 minutes  
TwoPointMinCost
Metz et al.
     X 6.50 10.74 8.62 12 minutes Point S and point E
VirtualContrast
Wang and Smedby
 X     10.44 9.40 9.92 5 minutes  
AxialSymmetry
Dikici et al.
   X   8.51 11.59 10.05 5 minutes Point E
ElasticModel
Hernández Hoyos et al.
     X 10.81 10.20 10.51 2-6 minutes Global intens. thresh. + 1 point per axis
3DInteractiveTrack
Zhang et al.
     X 9.18 12.91 11.05 3-6 minutes 3 to 10 points
CoronaryTreeMorphoRec
Castro et al.
   X   12.29 13.57 12.93 30 minutes Point S

Overlap measures

MethodChallengeOVOFOT
 123%scorerank%scorerank%scorerank
MHT
Friman et al.
     X 98.5 84.0 2.21 83.1 72.8 3.16 98.7 84.5 2.19
VirtualContrast2b
Wang and Smedby
     X 96.7 73.0 3.86 74.5 63.3 4.56 96.9 74.7 3.61
Tracer
Szymczak
     X 95.1 71.0 4.67 63.5 52.0 6.23 95.5 70.2 4.78
BayesianMaxPaths
Lesage et al.
     X 97.5 81.6 2.55 78.8 70.8 3.44 97.7 81.5 2.64
DepthFirstModelFit
Zambal et al.
 X     84.7 48.6 9.08 65.3 49.2 6.44 87.0 60.1 7.14
KnowledgeBasedMinPath
Krissian et al.
   X   88.0 67.4 5.44 74.2 61.1 5.18 88.5 70.0 5.02
AutoCoronaryTree
Tek et al.
 X     84.7 46.5 10.03 59.5 36.1 8.77 86.2 50.3 9.39
CocomoBeach
Kitslaar et al.
 X     78.8 42.5 11.24 64.4 40.0 8.89 81.2 46.9 10.69
GVFTube'n'Linkage
Bauer and Bischof
 X     92.7 52.3 7.85 71.9 51.4 6.47 95.3 67.0 5.75
TwoPointMinCost
Metz et al.
     X 91.9 64.5 5.93 56.4 45.6 7.44 92.5 64.5 6.14
VirtualContrast
Wang and Smedby
 X     75.6 39.2 11.68 56.1 34.5 9.34 78.7 45.6 10.31
AxialSymmetry
Dikici et al.
   X   90.8 56.8 7.80 48.9 35.6 9.45 91.7 55.9 8.29
ElasticModel
Hernández Hoyos et al.
     X 77.0 40.5 11.52 52.1 31.5 10.07 79.0 45.3 10.84
3DInteractiveTrack
Zhang et al.
     X 89.6 51.1 8.78 49.9 30.5 9.97 90.6 52.4 8.78
CoronaryTreeMorphoRec
Castro et al.
   X   67.0 34.5 12.99 36.3 20.5 11.22 69.1 36.7 12.66

Accuracy measure

MethodChallengeAI
 123mmscorerank
MHT
Friman et al.
     X 0.23 47.9 1.77
VirtualContrast2b
Wang and Smedby
     X 0.27 41.6 3.81
Tracer
Szymczak
     X 0.26 44.4 2.97
BayesianMaxPaths
Lesage et al.
     X 0.29 37.0 5.96
DepthFirstModelFit
Zambal et al.
 X     0.28 41.9 4.01
KnowledgeBasedMinPath
Krissian et al.
   X   0.39 29.2 10.26
AutoCoronaryTree
Tek et al.
 X     0.34 35.3 6.66
CocomoBeach
Kitslaar et al.
 X     0.29 37.7 6.22
GVFTube'n'Linkage
Bauer and Bischof
 X     0.37 29.8 9.92
TwoPointMinCost
Metz et al.
     X 0.46 28.0 10.74
VirtualContrast
Wang and Smedby
 X     0.39 30.6 9.40
AxialSymmetry
Dikici et al.
   X   0.46 26.4 11.59
ElasticModel
Hernández Hoyos et al.
     X 0.40 29.3 10.20
3DInteractiveTrack
Zhang et al.
     X 0.51 24.2 12.91
CoronaryTreeMorphoRec
Castro et al.
   X   0.59 20.7 13.57